| GISPRI co-hosted the Seminar on the “IPCC Special Report
                  on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage” with Advanced Industrial
                  Science and Technology (AIST), on Thursday, December 22, 2005,
                  at the Hotel Floracion Aoyama in Tokyo. The Carbon Capture and Storage is a series of technologies
                  to capture carbon dioxide emissions of large scale sources
                  such as power plants, and to store them in geological formation
                  or in oceans. The technology is recently drawing attentions
                  as an effective method of global warming mitigation.
 In September 2005, the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Panel
                  on Climate Change adopted the “Special Report on Carbon Dioxide
                  Capture and Storage.” This seminar had presentations on the
                  Report by the Japanese authors and relevant experts, followed
                  by a discussion session between the presenters and participants.
 
 【Presentations】1. Masahiro Nishio (METI / AIST)
 Dr. Nishio made a presentation titled “the Background and
                    Future of CCS”, summarizing the past history of CCS studies
                    in Japan, and introducing the recent trends in CCS-related
                  international cooperation and pilot projects.
 2. Hisashi Ishitani, Professor, Keio University and Lead
                      Author of Chapter 1: “Introduction”Prof. Ishitani summarized the past CCS discussions at
                      the IPCC, and indicated that in the IPCC Third Assessment
                      Report,
                      global efforts in climate change stepped up to the stage
                      of pursuing more practical and economic mitigation measures.
                      At the same time, the IPCC set two separate working groups
                      to address adaptation measures and mitigation measures,
                      showing the damages of global warming more apparently.
                      With these background, the CCS technology, which used to
                      be a mere part of mitigation measures, started to draw
                      attention. Professor Ishitani also explained important
                      points of CCS technologies discussed in the Chapter 1.
 3. Masaki Iijima, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and Lead
                      Author of Chapter 3: “Capture of CO2” Mr. Iijima explained the “capture” part of the CCS technology
                      discussed in Chapter 3, and indicated that the report assumes
                      power plants as CCS technology application sites. Also,
                      he pointed out the vast regional differences in geological
                      storage potentials. In North America and Europe, CO2 emission
                      sources have geological storage potentials (acquifer) at
                      or near them, while there is almost no potential of geological
                      storage in Japan. He also pointed out the importance of
                      capturing CO2 from flue gas (post combustion) because most
                      of the current CO2 emissions come from flue gas. The cost
                      of CO2 capture is about 15 - 75 US$/tCO2 (net capture)
                      at coal or gas-fired power plants.
 4. Takashi Ohsumi, Central Research Institute of Electric
                      Power Industry, Lead Author of Chapter 6: “Chapter 5: Geological
                      storage”  Dr. Ohsumi explained Chapter 5 Geological Storage, which
                      dominates about one fifth of the entire Special Report.
                      He indicated the extreme difficulty in estimating the potential
                      capacity of geological storage, and mentioned that the
                      range would be from 1.5 billion to 80 billion tons in Japan,
                      and 200 billion to 5.6 trillion tons in the world . Dr.
                      Ohsumi also stated that the Special Report explained the
                      current situation of CCS technologies based on the ongoing
                      projects in the world. He also presented some other issues
                      including the CO2 retention rate for geological storage
                      (likely to exceed 99% even after 1,000 years), risk assessment,
                      and legal issues (such as “London Convention” or relevant
                      domestic laws). 5. Yoshihisa Shirayama, Professor, Kyoto University, Lead
                      Author of Chapter 6: Ocean StorageProf. Shirayama presented Chapter 6 of the Report, and
                      indicated that despite today’s fairly high level of scientific
                      knowledge and insights about ocean storage, it is not sufficient
                      to warrant the safety of such storage.
 6. Yasumasa Fujii, Professor, the University of Tokyo,
                      Lead Author of Chapter 8: Cost and Economic PotentialProf. Fujii presented Chapter 8 of the Report, which summarized
                      the costs of capture, transport and storage of CO2 described
                      in Chapter 3 to 7. He indicated that the CCS will increase
                      electricity costs by 40-70% at coal power plants or natural
                      gas combined cycle power plants (GCC), and by 20-55% at
                      integrated gas combined cycle power plants (IGCC). In the
                      future, 20-30 % cost reduction will be possible. In terms
                      of transportation costs, pipeline have cost advantage for
                      the distance of 1200 km or shorter, while shipping will
                      be more advantageous in case of longer distance. The monitoring
                      cost of geological storage is estimated as about 0.1 to
                      0.3 US$/tCO2. Prof. Fujii also discussed the role of CCS
                      in the analysis of integrated assessment model. As a long
                      term measure, CCS is a favorable technology with relatively
                      large reduction potential and low marginal abatement cost.
                      On the other hand, because of the fact that more energy
                      (i.e. more fossil fuels) is involved to operate CCS, careful
                      economic consideration should be carried out.
 7. Makoto Akai, Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
                      (AIST), Lead Author of Summary for Policymakers and Technical
                      Summary, Coordinating Lead Author of Chapter 6, and Contributing
                      Author of Chapter 8 Dr. Akai explained the background of CCS Special Report
                      preparation, and presented the details of the Summary for
                      Policymakers.
 The SPM point out that CCS is an effective global warming
                      measure. However, as no single technology option will be
                      able to provide massive emission reduction, it is necessary
                      to have a portfolio of technologies. In addition, he introduced
                      other points indicated in the SPM, such as the costs of
                      CCS, energy requirement, possible locations of mass CO2
                      sources for CCS, technological potentials of CO2 reduction,
                      and geological retention rate of CO2 for a longer term.
  After these presentations, Mr. Taka Hiraishi, Co-chair
                      of IPCC National GHG Inventory Programme, made comment
                      on the Report as well as explained the relevant provisions
                      of 2006 IPCC Guidlines for National GHG Inventory, which
                      was due in Spring 2006. At the question and answer session,
                      several questions were raised from the floor, such as ultra
                      long-term management issue (leakage), implications of CCS
                      for diffusion of renewable energies(with CCS adding cost
                      to fossil fuel use), prospects of ocean storage, public
                      awareness, etc., each of which were duly answered by the
                    presenters. 
 
 |